AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives
January 16, 2026
In-depth

In January 2026, Count on Mothers released findings from a nationally representative study of mothers across regions and the political spectrum on artificial intelligence's impact on children across home, school, and social settings — conducted in research collaboration with academic partners at the University of Chicago and University College London. Mothers assess potential risks, transparency gaps, and the need for institutional safeguards as AI becomes embedded in children's everyday environments. Findings describe a consistent message across political ideology, region, and education level: mothers are deeply concerned about AI's impact on children and overwhelmingly believe current deployments lack adequate protections.

Related themes:

Shared Priorities and Cross-Partisan Alignment Among Mothers

Children’s Health, Safety, and Youth-Facing Environments

  • Only 6% of U.S. mothers believe AI is a positive force and that children should simply "learn to use it" — one of the strongest consensus findings in the survey. 20% believe AI tools should be strictly limited for minors under 18; 34% are open to AI use only with adult oversight and clear safety standards.
  • Mothers' top concerns are tightly concentrated around three developmental risks: exposure to unsafe or inappropriate content (63%), confusion between human- and AI-generated interactions (55%), and behavioral or social–emotional changes (51%). Only 8% of mothers report no specific concerns about AI and children.
  • 80% of mothers do not feel fully confident they understand how their child's data are collected or used by AI systems, and 11% did not know data were being collected at all. Mothers with lower confidence in data practices show substantially higher overall concern, consistent with trust erosion when data collection is discovered after the fact.
  • 43% of mothers report their child uses AI for school, and 30% report AI access through a school-issued device — institutional adoption that begins in elementary grades. Among children ages 4–7, over one-quarter encounter AI via school devices; among ages 8–12, roughly one-third do.
  • 25% of mothers of children ages 8–12 report that their child uses AI to accomplish tasks such as thinking, organization, and planning — functions central to executive skill development during a critical period of brain maturation.
  • Across political ideology, education level, and region, mothers consistently call for enforceable safeguards — including clear disclosure when children interact with AI, age-appropriate design, limits on data collection and behavioral manipulation, and institutional accountability that does not rely on parental vigilance alone.

Source: Count on Mothers, AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives, January 2026. Nationally representative survey of U.S. mothers, n=2,290, fielded October 20 – November 30, 2025, weighted to reflect national distributions of political ideology, region, race and ethnicity, education level, and children's ages. Conducted in research collaboration with Dr. Dana Suskind and colleagues at the University of Chicago, and Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr and colleagues at University College London. Research led by a PhD-credentialed researcher and an MPH data scientist.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationally representative research with U.S. mothers, weighted to reflect the population and reported in aggregate. Research is led by a PhD + MPH team. Findings have informed policy, industry, and media, and entered the Congressional Record on childcare, paid leave, and technology policy.
In-depth

AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives

In January 2026, Count on Mothers released findings from a nationally representative study of mothers across regions and the political spectrum on artificial intelligence's impact on children across home, school, and social settings — conducted in research collaboration with academic partners at the University of Chicago and University College London. Mothers assess potential risks, transparency gaps, and the need for institutional safeguards as AI becomes embedded in children's everyday environments. Findings describe a consistent message across political ideology, region, and education level: mothers are deeply concerned about AI's impact on children and overwhelmingly believe current deployments lack adequate protections.
January 16, 2026
View Report →
In-depth

Pulse Check 2025: Mothers on Child Mental Health Impacts, Care, and Support

In September 2025, Count on Mothers released findings from a nationally representative study of mothers across regions and the political spectrum on children's mental health needs, access to care, and family experiences navigating support systems. The study examines mothers' firsthand observations at home, in schools, and in healthcare settings to identify gaps in care and practical paths forward. Findings underscore the scale of unmet need, the central role of cost and insurance barriers, and the importance of school-based and family-centered solutions.
September 17, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

From the Heart of American Families: Assessing Mothers' Views on Recent Policy Actions

This report presents mothers’ views on early federal policy actions under the 2025 Administration, drawing on survey responses from 2,888 mothers across the United States collected between April and June 2025. Mothers rated their level of satisfaction and shared open-ended reflections based on lived experience. Findings reveal low overall approval, with economic pressures emerging as the dominant driver of dissatisfaction across political and regional lines.
July 15, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

The Real Cost of Health Insurance: Exploring Critical Challenges for U.S. Families

In February 2025, Count on Mothers examined U.S. families' experiences with health insurance affordability, coverage, and access to care. Drawing on a nationally representative survey of mothers across regions and the political spectrum, the study addressed five core questions: who drives healthcare decisions, rates of denied and delayed care, the administrative burden on families, differences between private and public insurance experiences, and the health and financial consequences for families. Findings describe systemic challenges in the current health insurance landscape — particularly among families with private insurance.
February 24, 2025
View Report →
To learn more about partnerships, visit Partner With Us
Exploring how independent benchmark data could inform your work?
Partner With Us