The Real Cost of Health Insurance: Exploring Critical Challenges for U.S. Families
In-depth

This report analyzes responses from 6,073 mothers across all 50 states and the political spectrum to examine the real-world impact of health insurance on families’ access to care and financial security. Conducted in collaboration with News Not Noise following widespread public sharing of insurance-related hardships, the study documents the prevalence of administrative barriers, denied and delayed care, and resulting health harms—particularly among families with private insurance. Findings highlight systemic challenges in the current health insurance landscape and their consequences for family well-being.

February 24, 2025
Related themes:

Shared Priorities and Cross-Partisan Alignment Among Mothers

Family Economic Security and Cost Pressures

Child and Family Mental Health Access and Support

  • Administrative burden is widespread:
    Nearly 65% of mothers report struggling with excessive paperwork and authorization hurdles to access essential care, with burdens more pronounced among families with private insurance.
  • Insurance companies often override medical judgment:
    More than half of mothers (54%) say insurance companies exert more control over healthcare decisions than doctors, and 60% of these mothers report that their family’s health has suffered as a result.
  • Denied and delayed care cause real harm:
    About 45% of mothers report that an insurance decision harmed their family’s health, and a similar share report being denied treatments they believed should have been covered.
  • Delays are strongly linked to negative health outcomes:
    Among mothers forced to delay or forgo care due to insurance requirements, 72% report adverse health effects, compared with 22% among those who did not experience delays.
  • Private insurance is associated with worse outcomes:
    Families with private—especially self-paid—insurance report higher denial rates, greater administrative burdens, and more frequent negative health impacts than those covered by Medicaid or Medicare.

This report analyzes responses from 6,073 mothers across all 50 states and the political spectrum to examine the real-world impact of health insurance on families’ access to care and financial security. Conducted in collaboration with News Not Noise following widespread public sharing of insurance-related hardships, the study documents the prevalence of administrative barriers, denied and delayed care, and resulting health harms—particularly among families with private insurance. Findings highlight systemic challenges in the current health insurance landscape and their consequences for family well-being.

This report focuses on information Count on Mothers collected in January 2025. The study seeks to answer these pressing questions: Are there real and significant burdens placed on families by health insurance policies? What are the rates and impacts of harm, if any? And most importantly, what changes could make a meaningful difference for American families? This report explores the real costs of health insurance by analyzing the challenges U.S.families face when navigating the complex healthcare system with an eye toward solutions.  A total of 6073 mothers residing in 50 states and across the political spectrum provided feedback based on their firsthand knowledge. Regarding the political background of the survey respondents, the sample closely reflects the U.S. breakdown of political ideology among women according to Gallup. After analyzing Mothers’ opinions from the survey, we take this aggregate data and share it with industry leaders, policymakers, and the public so they are educated on Mothers’ firsthand experiences, needs, and concerns.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationwide surveys and qualitative research with U.S. mothers. Findings are analyzed and reported in aggregate to inform research publications and decision-making related to families.
In-depth

Insights into American Mothers' Views on Baby Food Product Safety

This report examines mothers’ concerns about heavy metals and other contaminants in baby and toddler food, drawing on a national survey conducted in collaboration with the Clean Label Project. Nearly 1,000 mothers across the U.S. shared how they assess infant food safety, their awareness of legislative efforts such as California’s AB 899, and where they seek trusted information. Findings show widespread concern about food contaminants, strong support for transparency and regulation, and a notable gap between mothers’ concern and their awareness of existing policy initiatives.
November 29, 2024
View Report →
Rapid

Safe School Meals Act

In October 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 709 mothers across 48 states and the political spectrum to understand views on the Safe School Meals Act, introduced in the Senate in September 2024. Mothers shared firsthand perspectives on school meal nutrition, food safety standards, and key provisions of the bill, including limits on heavy metals, pesticide residues, food additives, and toxic packaging. Findings were analyzed to assess the level of alignment across demographics and to identify the provisions mothers view as most critical for protecting children’s health.
October 31, 2024
View Report →
Rapid

The U.S. Education Climate

In September 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 669 mothers across 46 states and the political spectrum to understand their views and firsthand experiences with public schools. The study examined school enrollment patterns, levels of trust and satisfaction, interest in switching school types, and the factors driving declines in public school enrollment. Findings highlight strong overall participation in and trust toward public schools, alongside persistent concerns—particularly related to bullying, safety, and accountability.
September 30, 2024
View Report →
Rapid

The Bipartisan Childcare Package

In August 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 800 mothers across 47 states and the political spectrum to assess views on two bipartisan childcare bills: the Childcare Availability and Affordability Act and the Childcare Workforce Act. Mothers shared firsthand experiences with childcare costs, tax credits, and flexible spending accounts (FSAs), and evaluated which policy solutions would most effectively support their families. Findings were analyzed to inform policymakers on which components mothers believe would meaningfully improve childcare access, affordability, and family stability.
August 30, 2024
View Report →
Interested in commissioning research or receiving a briefing?
Partner With Us