Insights into American Mothers' Views on Baby Food Product Safety
In-depth

This report examines mothers’ concerns about heavy metals and other contaminants in baby and toddler food, drawing on a national survey conducted in collaboration with the Clean Label Project. Nearly 1,000 mothers across the U.S. shared how they assess infant food safety, their awareness of legislative efforts such as California’s AB 899, and where they seek trusted information. Findings show widespread concern about food contaminants, strong support for transparency and regulation, and a notable gap between mothers’ concern and their awareness of existing policy initiatives.

November 29, 2024
Related themes:
No items found.
  • High concern about heavy metals in baby food:
    A majority of mothers report moderate to high concern about exposure to heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury in foods for infants and toddlers.
  • Labels strongly influence purchasing decisions:
    Nearly 97% of mothers look for terms like “all natural,” “pure,” or “organic” when buying baby food, with labels serving as a primary proxy for health and safety—especially among lower-income and less-educated mothers.
  • Low awareness, high perceived impact of legislation:
    While nearly half of mothers had not heard of California’s AB 899, 88% believe legislation regulating heavy metals in baby food would impact their daily lives, highlighting a significant information gap.
  • Strong preference for testing and transparency:
    Most mothers say they would prefer baby food brands that test for and disclose levels of harmful metals, indicating demand for clearer labeling and mandatory reporting.
  • Trust centers on institutions, not media:
    Mothers most often rely on government agencies, doctors, and academic research for information on food safety, with comparatively low trust in social media and traditional news outlets.
  • Growing mistrust of baby food companies:
    Open-ended responses reveal concern about industry practices and a desire for greater accountability, with some mothers choosing homemade baby food to avoid perceived risks.

This report examines mothers’ concerns about heavy metals and other contaminants in baby and toddler food, drawing on a national survey conducted in collaboration with the Clean Label Project. Nearly 1,000 mothers across the U.S. shared how they assess infant food safety, their awareness of legislative efforts such as California’s AB 899, and where they seek trusted information. Findings show widespread concern about food contaminants, strong support for transparency and regulation, and a notable gap between mothers’ concern and their awareness of existing policy initiatives.

This report focuses on information Count on Mothers collected from November 21st through December 6, 2024 in collaboration with the Clean Label Project to assess mothers’ views and levels of concern regarding heavy metals, access to information, and overall trust in baby food products. We compiled the results to share with industry leaders and the public. In addition, an open-ended question was provided to compile more nuanced responses, specifically to find mothers' critical themes of concern. A total of 949 Mothers residing in 47 states and from a representative demographic distribution provided feedback based on their first-hand knowledge. Regarding the political background of the survey respondents, the sample closely reflects the U.S. breakdown of political ideology among women according to Gallup. After analyzing Mothers’ opinions from the survey, we take this aggregate data and share it with industry leaders, policymakers, and the public so they are educated on Mothers’ firsthand experiences, needs, and concerns.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationwide surveys and qualitative research with U.S. mothers. Findings are analyzed and reported in aggregate to inform research publications and decision-making related to families.
In-Depth

AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives

A National Study of Artificial Intelligence in Children’s Lives Across Home, School, and Social Contexts: Mothers Assess Risks, Transparency, and Safeguards. Conducted in collaboration with researchers at the University of Chicago and University College London, including Dr. Dana Suskind and Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr, this nationally representative study pairs survey data with open-ended responses to capture mothers’ firsthand observations, concerns, and expectations as AI becomes increasingly embedded in children’s learning, play, and social interactions.
January 16, 2026
View Report →
In-depth

Pulse Check 2025: Mothers on Child Mental Health Impacts, Care, and Support

Pulse Check 2025, a nationally representative study of 2,700 U.S. mothers, examines children’s mental health needs, access to care, and family experiences navigating support systems. Conducted in partnership with Inseparable, the report centers mothers’ firsthand observations at home, in schools, and in healthcare settings to identify gaps in care and practical paths forward. Findings underscore the scale of unmet need, the central role of cost and insurance barriers, and the importance of school-based and family-centered solutions.
September 17, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

From the Heart of American Families: Assessing Mothers' Views on Recent Policy Actions

This report presents mothers’ views on early federal policy actions under the 2025 Administration, drawing on survey responses from 2,888 mothers across the United States collected between April and June 2025. Mothers rated their level of satisfaction and shared open-ended reflections based on lived experience. Findings reveal low overall approval, with economic pressures emerging as the dominant driver of dissatisfaction across political and regional lines.
July 15, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

The Real Cost of Health Insurance: Exploring Critical Challenges for U.S. Families

This report analyzes responses from 6,073 mothers across all 50 states and the political spectrum to examine the real-world impact of health insurance on families’ access to care and financial security. Conducted in collaboration with News Not Noise following widespread public sharing of insurance-related hardships, the study documents the prevalence of administrative barriers, denied and delayed care, and resulting health harms—particularly among families with private insurance. Findings highlight systemic challenges in the current health insurance landscape and their consequences for family well-being.
February 24, 2025
View Report →
Interested in commissioning research or receiving a briefing?
Partner With Us