New Bipartisan Paid Leave Bill Framework
In-depth

In February 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 722 mothers across 48 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand their views on the House Bipartisan Paid Leave Working Group Legislative Framework. Mothers shared perspectives grounded in their firsthand experiences with unpaid and limited paid leave. Aggregated findings were shared with the House Bipartisan Working Group, policymakers, and the public to inform deliberations on paid leave policy. Overall, mothers across the political spectrum viewed the framework favorably and expressed broad support for establishing a national paid leave program.

February 29, 2024
Related themes:

Shared Priorities and Cross-Partisan Alignment Among Mothers

  • Paid leave widely viewed as insufficient:
    Mothers across political backgrounds reported that the current paid leave landscape does not meet the needs of working families, with many describing unpaid leave under FMLA as financially destabilizing or impossible to use.
  • Strong support for a national paid leave program:
    More than 80% of mothers held a favorable view of the bipartisan framework and agreed that the U.S. should guarantee paid leave coverage for caregiving and health needs without placing the full burden on businesses.
  • Positive but qualified reception of the framework:
    Mothers generally viewed the bipartisan framework as an improvement over the current system, particularly given limited employer-provided leave, but noted it would not fully close existing gaps.
  • Financial strain remains a key concern:
    One in five mothers reported needing more paid leave and struggling with financial pressures related to caregiving and time off work.
  • Concerns about uneven access:
    Among mothers who viewed the framework unfavorably, the primary concern was that allowing states to opt out could limit access and reduce effectiveness.

In February 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 722 mothers across 48 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand their views on the House Bipartisan Paid Leave Working Group Legislative Framework. Mothers shared perspectives grounded in their firsthand experiences with unpaid and limited paid leave. Aggregated findings were shared with the House Bipartisan Working Group, policymakers, and the public to inform deliberations on paid leave policy. Overall, mothers across the political spectrum viewed the framework favorably and expressed broad support for establishing a national paid leave program.

Main Takeaways:
Across the political spectrum, Mothers feel like the current state of paid leave is insufficient to meet the needs of working families. Specifically, some Moms said it was “financially crippling” after taking unpaid leave afforded to them under FMLA, while other moms said they had to save their PTO/vacation days “for years” to use for parental leave. Additionally, some Moms even said that they were unable to take any unpaid leave and returned to the workplace soon after having a baby. Overall, Mothers believed that having a paid leave program would be beneficial to individual families and society as a whole.

Quantitative Questions
Over 80% of Mothers both had a favorable opinion of the proposed framework, AND ALSO believed that the U.S. should have a national program that guarantees coverage to all working people to care for a new child, a loved one, or themselves without putting the full costs on businesses.

Qualitative Questions
When provided an open field to share what their family needed:
Mothers were positive about the bipartisan framework for a paid leave bill, and those mothers believed it would be better than the current state, as “many private employers do not offer any kind of paid family leave” and felt it was a "great" start but would not sufficiently fill the gaps.

1 in 5 mothers wrote they needed more paid leave and are struggling with financial needs.

The main problem for mothers, who believed the framework was unfavorable to families, was that many states would opt-out.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationwide surveys and qualitative research with U.S. mothers. Findings are analyzed and reported in aggregate to inform research publications and decision-making related to families.
Rapid

Issues that Matter Most to Mothers

From January through June 2024, Count on Mothers asked mothers nationwide to identify the single most pressing issue they wished policymakers would address related to their children’s health or safety. Findings from this open-ended question informed a follow-up survey conducted in July 2024 with 593 mothers across 49 states and the political spectrum. Results show striking consistency across geography, education, and ideology in the issues mothers prioritize, as well as in the underlying stresses shaping family life.
July 31, 2024
View Report →
Rapid

Mothers' Views on Big Business and Trust

In June 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 650 mothers nationwide to identify industries they find most concerning for families and to gather open-ended feedback directed at corporate leaders. Mothers across political ideologies and regions expressed consistent concerns about safety, trust, and corporate accountability. Findings reveal broad, cross-partisan unease with how major industries impact children’s health, development, and family well-being.
June 28, 2024
View Report →
In-depth

The Impact of Childcare Costs on Families' Financial Security

In May 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 1,048 mothers across 48 states and the political spectrum to examine how childcare costs and access affect family financial security. Mothers shared quantitative responses and open-ended insights based on firsthand experience. Findings show that childcare expenses and availability have significant, measurable impacts on household income, savings, and long-term earning potential across families nationwide.
May 31, 2024
View Report →
Rapid

The PROTECT Act and Recommendations from the Youth Vaping Epidemic Report

In April 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 595 mothers across 49 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand their views on federal recommendations for regulating e-cigarettes, including provisions from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations report and the PROTECT Act. Mothers shared perspectives based on firsthand experience with youth vaping and access to e-cigarette products. Aggregated findings were shared with the Senate Subcommittee and the public to inform ongoing policy discussions. Overall, mothers across the political spectrum expressed strong agreement on the need for strengthened federal research, regulation, and enforcement to reduce youth e-cigarette use.
April 30, 2024
View Report →
Interested in commissioning research or receiving a briefing?
Partner With Us