New Bipartisan Paid Leave Bill Framework
In-depth

In February 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 722 mothers across 48 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand their views on the House Bipartisan Paid Leave Working Group Legislative Framework. Mothers shared perspectives grounded in their firsthand experiences with unpaid and limited paid leave. Aggregated findings were shared with the House Bipartisan Working Group, policymakers, and the public to inform deliberations on paid leave policy. Overall, mothers across the political spectrum viewed the framework favorably and expressed broad support for establishing a national paid leave program.

February 29, 2024
Related themes:

Shared Priorities and Cross-Partisan Alignment Among Mothers

  • Paid leave widely viewed as insufficient:
    Mothers across political backgrounds reported that the current paid leave landscape does not meet the needs of working families, with many describing unpaid leave under FMLA as financially destabilizing or impossible to use.
  • Strong support for a national paid leave program:
    More than 80% of mothers held a favorable view of the bipartisan framework and agreed that the U.S. should guarantee paid leave coverage for caregiving and health needs without placing the full burden on businesses.
  • Positive but qualified reception of the framework:
    Mothers generally viewed the bipartisan framework as an improvement over the current system, particularly given limited employer-provided leave, but noted it would not fully close existing gaps.
  • Financial strain remains a key concern:
    One in five mothers reported needing more paid leave and struggling with financial pressures related to caregiving and time off work.
  • Concerns about uneven access:
    Among mothers who viewed the framework unfavorably, the primary concern was that allowing states to opt out could limit access and reduce effectiveness.

In February 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 722 mothers across 48 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand their views on the House Bipartisan Paid Leave Working Group Legislative Framework. Mothers shared perspectives grounded in their firsthand experiences with unpaid and limited paid leave. Aggregated findings were shared with the House Bipartisan Working Group, policymakers, and the public to inform deliberations on paid leave policy. Overall, mothers across the political spectrum viewed the framework favorably and expressed broad support for establishing a national paid leave program.

Main Takeaways:
Across the political spectrum, Mothers feel like the current state of paid leave is insufficient to meet the needs of working families. Specifically, some Moms said it was “financially crippling” after taking unpaid leave afforded to them under FMLA, while other moms said they had to save their PTO/vacation days “for years” to use for parental leave. Additionally, some Moms even said that they were unable to take any unpaid leave and returned to the workplace soon after having a baby. Overall, Mothers believed that having a paid leave program would be beneficial to individual families and society as a whole.

Quantitative Questions
Over 80% of Mothers both had a favorable opinion of the proposed framework, AND ALSO believed that the U.S. should have a national program that guarantees coverage to all working people to care for a new child, a loved one, or themselves without putting the full costs on businesses.

Qualitative Questions
When provided an open field to share what their family needed:
Mothers were positive about the bipartisan framework for a paid leave bill, and those mothers believed it would be better than the current state, as “many private employers do not offer any kind of paid family leave” and felt it was a "great" start but would not sufficiently fill the gaps.

1 in 5 mothers wrote they needed more paid leave and are struggling with financial needs.

The main problem for mothers, who believed the framework was unfavorable to families, was that many states would opt-out.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationwide surveys and qualitative research with U.S. mothers. Findings are analyzed and reported in aggregate to inform research publications and decision-making related to families.
In-Depth

AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives

A National Study of Artificial Intelligence in Children’s Lives Across Home, School, and Social Contexts: Mothers Assess Risks, Transparency, and Safeguards. Conducted in collaboration with researchers at the University of Chicago and University College London, including Dr. Dana Suskind and Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr, this nationally representative study pairs survey data with open-ended responses to capture mothers’ firsthand observations, concerns, and expectations as AI becomes increasingly embedded in children’s learning, play, and social interactions.
January 16, 2026
View Report →
In-depth

Pulse Check 2025: Mothers on Child Mental Health Impacts, Care, and Support

Pulse Check 2025, a nationally representative study of 2,700 U.S. mothers, examines children’s mental health needs, access to care, and family experiences navigating support systems. Conducted in partnership with Inseparable, the report centers mothers’ firsthand observations at home, in schools, and in healthcare settings to identify gaps in care and practical paths forward. Findings underscore the scale of unmet need, the central role of cost and insurance barriers, and the importance of school-based and family-centered solutions.
September 17, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

From the Heart of American Families: Assessing Mothers' Views on Recent Policy Actions

This report presents mothers’ views on early federal policy actions under the 2025 Administration, drawing on survey responses from 2,888 mothers across the United States collected between April and June 2025. Mothers rated their level of satisfaction and shared open-ended reflections based on lived experience. Findings reveal low overall approval, with economic pressures emerging as the dominant driver of dissatisfaction across political and regional lines.
July 15, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

The Real Cost of Health Insurance: Exploring Critical Challenges for U.S. Families

This report analyzes responses from 6,073 mothers across all 50 states and the political spectrum to examine the real-world impact of health insurance on families’ access to care and financial security. Conducted in collaboration with News Not Noise following widespread public sharing of insurance-related hardships, the study documents the prevalence of administrative barriers, denied and delayed care, and resulting health harms—particularly among families with private insurance. Findings highlight systemic challenges in the current health insurance landscape and their consequences for family well-being.
February 24, 2025
View Report →
Interested in commissioning research or receiving a briefing?
Partner With Us