AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives
January 16, 2026
In-depth

In January 2026, Count on Mothers released findings from a nationally representative study of mothers across regions and the political spectrum on artificial intelligence's impact on children across home, school, and social settings — conducted in research collaboration with academic partners at the University of Chicago and University College London. Mothers assess potential risks, transparency gaps, and the need for institutional safeguards as AI becomes embedded in children's everyday environments. Findings describe a consistent message across political ideology, region, and education level: mothers are deeply concerned about AI's impact on children and overwhelmingly believe current deployments lack adequate protections.

Related themes:

Shared Priorities and Cross-Partisan Alignment Among Mothers

Children’s Health, Safety, and Youth-Facing Environments

  • Only 6% of U.S. mothers believe AI is a positive force and that children should simply "learn to use it" — one of the strongest consensus findings in the survey. 20% believe AI tools should be strictly limited for minors under 18; 34% are open to AI use only with adult oversight and clear safety standards.
  • Mothers' top concerns are tightly concentrated around three developmental risks: exposure to unsafe or inappropriate content (63%), confusion between human- and AI-generated interactions (55%), and behavioral or social–emotional changes (51%). Only 8% of mothers report no specific concerns about AI and children.
  • 80% of mothers do not feel fully confident they understand how their child's data are collected or used by AI systems, and 11% did not know data were being collected at all. Mothers with lower confidence in data practices show substantially higher overall concern, consistent with trust erosion when data collection is discovered after the fact.
  • 43% of mothers report their child uses AI for school, and 30% report AI access through a school-issued device — institutional adoption that begins in elementary grades. Among children ages 4–7, over one-quarter encounter AI via school devices; among ages 8–12, roughly one-third do.
  • 25% of mothers of children ages 8–12 report that their child uses AI to accomplish tasks such as thinking, organization, and planning — functions central to executive skill development during a critical period of brain maturation.
  • Across political ideology, education level, and region, mothers consistently call for enforceable safeguards — including clear disclosure when children interact with AI, age-appropriate design, limits on data collection and behavioral manipulation, and institutional accountability that does not rely on parental vigilance alone.

Source: Count on Mothers, AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives, January 2026. Nationally representative survey of U.S. mothers, n=2,290, fielded October 20 – November 30, 2025, weighted to reflect national distributions of political ideology, region, race and ethnicity, education level, and children's ages. Conducted in research collaboration with Dr. Dana Suskind and colleagues at the University of Chicago, and Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr and colleagues at University College London. Research led by a PhD-credentialed researcher and an MPH data scientist.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationally representative research with U.S. mothers, weighted to reflect the population and reported in aggregate. Research is led by a PhD + MPH team. Findings have informed policy, industry, and media, and entered the Congressional Record on childcare, paid leave, and technology policy.
In-depth

Insights into American Mothers' Views on Baby Food Product Safety

This report examines mothers’ concerns about heavy metals and other contaminants in baby and toddler food, drawing on a national survey conducted in collaboration with the Clean Label Project. Nearly 1,000 mothers across the U.S. shared how they assess infant food safety, their awareness of legislative efforts such as California’s AB 899, and where they seek trusted information. Findings show widespread concern about food contaminants, strong support for transparency and regulation, and a notable gap between mothers’ concern and their awareness of existing policy initiatives.
November 29, 2024
View Report →
Rapid Poll

Mothers' Views on the Safe School Meals Act

In October 2024, Count on Mothers examined mothers' views on the Safe School Meals Act, federal legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate in September 2024 to strengthen FDA food safety standards for school meals. Drawing on a nationally representative sample of mothers across regions and the political spectrum, the survey evaluated the bill's six main provisions — FDA limits on heavy metals, bans on pesticide residues, restrictions on harmful packaging chemicals, food additive reevaluation, grants for farmers and manufacturers to transition to safer practices, and mothers' trust in current FDA standards.
October 31, 2024
View Report →
Rapid Poll

Mothers' Views on the U.S. Education Climate

In September 2024, Count on Mothers examined mothers' views and firsthand experiences with U.S. public schools, including school enrollment patterns, trust in teachers and administrators, perceptions of school environment, and interest in switching school types. Drawing on a nationally representative sample of mothers across regions and the political spectrum, the survey captured five core dimensions of mothers' relationship to public education and an open-ended question on the most important problem to solve in their district's public schools. Mothers reported broadly positive views of public schools alongside specific, persistent concerns — most prominently bullying, safety, and administrative accountability.
September 30, 2024
View Report →
Rapid Poll

Mothers' Views on the Bipartisan Childcare Package

In August 2024, Count on Mothers examined mothers' views on two bipartisan, bicameral childcare bills introduced by Senators Katie Britt (R-AL) and Tim Kaine (D-VA) — the Childcare Availability and Affordability Act and the Childcare Workforce Act. Drawing on a nationally representative sample of mothers across regions and the political spectrum, the survey evaluated proposed increases to the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, expanded Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), and employer tax credits — alongside firsthand experience using these benefits and assessments of which policy mechanisms would most effectively support families.
August 30, 2024
View Report →
To learn more about partnerships, visit Partner With Us
Exploring how independent benchmark data could inform your work?
Partner With Us