Secure the Border Act (S.2824)
Rapid

In January 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 785 mothers across 47 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand their views on the Secure the Border Act. Mothers shared perspectives based on their lived experiences and concerns related to family safety and well-being. Aggregated findings were shared with Congressional legislators to inform deliberations on the bill and its underlying policy issues. Overall, mothers expressed mixed views on the legislation, with majority support for several individual components and notable variation by political ideology.

January 31, 2024
Related themes:
No items found.
  • Overall mixed support:
    Sixty percent of mothers believe the Secure the Border Act would have a positive impact on the safety, health, or well-being of children and families, while 23% were unsure and 17% did not agree.
  • Strong support for specific security measures:
    The highest levels of agreement were for requiring real-time access to international criminal history databases for background checks (80%) and improving border technology and staffing at U.S. borders (73%).
  • Lower support for provisions affecting children:
    The least-supported component was the removal of unaccompanied children who are not trafficking victims or do not fear return, supported by 51% of mothers.
  • Clear ideological patterns:
    Very conservative and conservative mothers largely supported all components of the bill, while liberal and very liberal mothers were more divided. Moderate mothers showed higher levels of uncertainty across most provisions.

In January 2024, Count on Mothers surveyed 785 mothers across 47 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand their views on the Secure the Border Act. Mothers shared perspectives based on their lived experiences and concerns related to family safety and well-being. Aggregated findings were shared with Congressional legislators to inform deliberations on the bill and its underlying policy issues. Overall, mothers expressed mixed views on the legislation, with majority support for several individual components and notable variation by political ideology.

60% of Mothers believe that overall, based on the 7 components surveyed, the "Secure the Border Act" would have a positive impact on the safety, health, or well-being of kids and families. 23% of Mothers surveyed were unsure whether the bill would have a positive impact, and 17% of Mothers surveyed did not agree with the bill.

The majority of Mothers support the (7) components, with the largest majority supporting 1) that the federal government should require real-time access to the criminal history databases of all countries of origin to perform background checks (80% of Mothers surveyed agree), and 2) that the federal government should improve technology and increase the number of Border Patrol agents at the southern and northern U.S. border (73% of Mothers surveyed agree). The least supported is the idea that unaccompanied children should be removed from the U.S. if they are not victims of trafficking or have a fear of return (51% of Mothers surveyed agreed). Among the specific components of the bill, a trend emerged along political lines. Most very conservative and conservative Mothers were in agreement with each aspect of the legislation. However, on almost every component, Mothers who identified as liberal and very liberal were split. In addition, on almost every component, mothers who identified as moderate showed significant uncertainty on the ideas in the bill.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationwide surveys and qualitative research with U.S. mothers. Findings are analyzed and reported in aggregate to inform research publications and decision-making related to families.
In-Depth

AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives

A National Study of Artificial Intelligence in Children’s Lives Across Home, School, and Social Contexts: Mothers Assess Risks, Transparency, and Safeguards. Conducted in collaboration with researchers at the University of Chicago and University College London, including Dr. Dana Suskind and Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr, this nationally representative study pairs survey data with open-ended responses to capture mothers’ firsthand observations, concerns, and expectations as AI becomes increasingly embedded in children’s learning, play, and social interactions.
January 16, 2026
View Report →
In-depth

Pulse Check 2025: Mothers on Child Mental Health Impacts, Care, and Support

Pulse Check 2025, a nationally representative study of 2,700 U.S. mothers, examines children’s mental health needs, access to care, and family experiences navigating support systems. Conducted in partnership with Inseparable, the report centers mothers’ firsthand observations at home, in schools, and in healthcare settings to identify gaps in care and practical paths forward. Findings underscore the scale of unmet need, the central role of cost and insurance barriers, and the importance of school-based and family-centered solutions.
September 17, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

From the Heart of American Families: Assessing Mothers' Views on Recent Policy Actions

This report presents mothers’ views on early federal policy actions under the 2025 Administration, drawing on survey responses from 2,888 mothers across the United States collected between April and June 2025. Mothers rated their level of satisfaction and shared open-ended reflections based on lived experience. Findings reveal low overall approval, with economic pressures emerging as the dominant driver of dissatisfaction across political and regional lines.
July 15, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

The Real Cost of Health Insurance: Exploring Critical Challenges for U.S. Families

This report analyzes responses from 6,073 mothers across all 50 states and the political spectrum to examine the real-world impact of health insurance on families’ access to care and financial security. Conducted in collaboration with News Not Noise following widespread public sharing of insurance-related hardships, the study documents the prevalence of administrative barriers, denied and delayed care, and resulting health harms—particularly among families with private insurance. Findings highlight systemic challenges in the current health insurance landscape and their consequences for family well-being.
February 24, 2025
View Report →
Interested in commissioning research or receiving a briefing?
Partner With Us