Mothers' Views on the FAMILY Act
Rapid

In August 2023, Count on Mothers surveyed 309 mothers across 41 states and a broad range of political ideologies to understand parental perspectives on the FAMILY (Family and Medical Insurance Leave) Act (S.1714). Mothers shared their views based on first-hand experience with health, caregiving, and work-related leave. The aggregated findings were shared with the public and Congressional legislators to inform deliberations on policies affecting children and families. Overall, mothers across political backgrounds showed strong alignment on core paid leave protections, with some variation on specific provisions.

August 31, 2023
Related themes:
No items found.
  • Broad cross-partisan input:
    The survey reflects the perspectives of mothers from 41 states and across the political spectrum, providing a diverse national view on paid family and medical leave.
  • Strong agreement on core paid leave protections:
    Mothers across ideologies overwhelmingly agreed that employees should have access to up to 12 weeks of paid leave for health, caregiving, or military-related reasons.
  • Consensus on job protection:
    Mothers agreed that employees who have worked at the same job for more than 90 days should be able to return to their positions after paid leave without employer retaliation.
  • Support for partial wage replacement:
    Mothers across political backgrounds supported paid leave that replaces up to two-thirds of regular wages for full-time employees.
  • Broad support across employment types, with some variation:
    A majority of mothers supported providing paid leave regardless of company size, employment status, or self-employment, though support was lower among very conservative mothers compared with conservative mothers.

In August 2023, 309 mothers from 41 states and a cross-section of political ideology completed the survey and shared their views on the "FAMILY (Family and Medical Insurance Leave) Act," (S.1714). We take this aggregate data and share it with the public and Congressional legislators so they are educated while deliberating over bills that can affect children and families. Mothers share their views based on their first-hand experience with the issues the bill seeks to address.

Count on Mothers is committed to representing mothers of all political ideologies on issues. Overwhelmingly, Mothers were aligned across the political spectrum on believing: Employees should have up to 12 weeks of partial income when they take time off from work for reasons relating to health, caregiving, and/ or military deployment of a relative; Employees who have worked for more than 90 days at the same job should be able to return to their jobs after paid leave and without retaliation from employers; and Mothers believe that full-time employees should earn up to 2/3 of their regular wages on this paid leave. The majority of mothers – regardless of political ideology – agreed on the importance of providing paid leave to employees regardless of company size, full-time/part-time status, and/ or self-employment status. However, there was variation within each political ideology and particularly, a conservative split between conservative and very conservative members with conservative mothers more likely than very conservative Mothers to support this provision. Similarly, Mothers are split in their belief that lowest-paid employees should earn up to 85% of their regular wages on this paid leave.

Research Library

Explore Count on Mothers reports — rapid polls and in-depth national studies.

Methodology
Count on Mothers conducts nationwide surveys and qualitative research with U.S. mothers. Findings are analyzed and reported in aggregate to inform research publications and decision-making related to families.
In-Depth

AI & Child Safety: Mothers' Views on a Rising Influence in Kids' Lives

A National Study of Artificial Intelligence in Children’s Lives Across Home, School, and Social Contexts: Mothers Assess Risks, Transparency, and Safeguards. Conducted in collaboration with researchers at the University of Chicago and University College London, including Dr. Dana Suskind and Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr, this nationally representative study pairs survey data with open-ended responses to capture mothers’ firsthand observations, concerns, and expectations as AI becomes increasingly embedded in children’s learning, play, and social interactions.
January 16, 2026
View Report →
In-depth

Pulse Check 2025: Mothers on Child Mental Health Impacts, Care, and Support

Pulse Check 2025, a nationally representative study of 2,700 U.S. mothers, examines children’s mental health needs, access to care, and family experiences navigating support systems. Conducted in partnership with Inseparable, the report centers mothers’ firsthand observations at home, in schools, and in healthcare settings to identify gaps in care and practical paths forward. Findings underscore the scale of unmet need, the central role of cost and insurance barriers, and the importance of school-based and family-centered solutions.
September 17, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

From the Heart of American Families: Assessing Mothers' Views on Recent Policy Actions

This report presents mothers’ views on early federal policy actions under the 2025 Administration, drawing on survey responses from 2,888 mothers across the United States collected between April and June 2025. Mothers rated their level of satisfaction and shared open-ended reflections based on lived experience. Findings reveal low overall approval, with economic pressures emerging as the dominant driver of dissatisfaction across political and regional lines.
July 15, 2025
View Report →
In-depth

The Real Cost of Health Insurance: Exploring Critical Challenges for U.S. Families

This report analyzes responses from 6,073 mothers across all 50 states and the political spectrum to examine the real-world impact of health insurance on families’ access to care and financial security. Conducted in collaboration with News Not Noise following widespread public sharing of insurance-related hardships, the study documents the prevalence of administrative barriers, denied and delayed care, and resulting health harms—particularly among families with private insurance. Findings highlight systemic challenges in the current health insurance landscape and their consequences for family well-being.
February 24, 2025
View Report →
Interested in commissioning research or receiving a briefing?
Partner With Us